Walking for Health: New Study Findings

Friday, 25 July, 2025226 words3 minutes
A comprehensive study published in the Lancet Public Health has challenged the widely accepted 10,000-step daily target, suggesting that 7,000 steps may be sufficient to confer significant health benefits. This research, which analyzed data from over 160,000 adults globally, provides compelling evidence that could reshape public health guidelines and personal fitness goals.
The study's findings indicate that individuals who walk 7,000 steps daily experience substantial reductions in health risks compared to those who walk only 2,000 steps. Notably, the risk of cardiovascular disease decreased by 25%, cancer risk by 6%, and dementia risk by a striking 38%. These results suggest that the 10,000-step benchmark, which originated from a 1960s Japanese marketing campaign, may be unnecessarily high for many people.
Interestingly, the research also revealed that even modest increases in daily step counts can yield health improvements. For instance, walking 4,000 steps daily was associated with better health outcomes compared to very low activity levels. However, the benefits appeared to plateau around 7,000 steps for most health conditions, with the exception of cardiovascular health, which showed continued improvements with higher step counts.
This nuanced understanding of the relationship between step count and health outcomes could have far-reaching implications for public health strategies and personal fitness tracking. It suggests that more attainable goals might encourage greater participation in physical activity, potentially leading to widespread health improvements across populations.
Origin
Walking for Health: New Study Findings
Download on the App Store

Audio

Loading audio ...
00:00

Words

  • confer
  • compelling
  • benchmark
  • nuanced
  • attainable

Quiz

  1. 1. What was the origin of the 10,000-step daily target?

  2. 2. According to the study, how does the benefit of increased step count change beyond 7,000 steps?

  3. 3. What potential impact could this research have on public health strategies?